The Long-Standing Issue of Mobility at the Olympics
From Host Cities to Host Regions in the Ongoing Case Study of Milano–Cortina 2026
|
OPEN ACCESS: Artigo disponível/Article available/Artículo disponible - ASSINANTE/SUBSCRIBER: Artigo para Assinante do periódico/Article for Journal Subscriber/Artículo para suscriptores de este periódico - PAY-PER-VIEW: Compre o artigo e leia/Buy the article and read/Compra el artículo y lee - IMAGE: Porta-bandeiras na cerimônia de abertura dos Jogos Olímpicos de Milano-Cortina 2026. Por:Vice President JD Vance, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons |
Keywords:
Olympic Agenda 2020, Olympic Games, Mega-Event Planning, Olympic City, Transport, Mobility, Sustainability, Milano–Cortina 2026Abstract
Due to public opposition against the unsustainability of hosting the Olympic Games, the International Olympic Committee adopted Olympic Agenda 2020 to adjust the event requirements to address modern society’s sustainability concerns. Since its implementation, the Agenda has driven important changes regarding the planning and organization of the Olympics, including the possibility of regions being hosts. This allows the sprawl of Olympic venues over larger territories, theoretically facilitating the alignment of event requirements with the needs of the intensively growing contemporary urban areas. However, the larger the host territory, the more complex becomes its mobility planning, as transport requirements for participants still have to be fulfilled, and the host populations still expect to inherit benefits from any investments made. The objective of this paper is to identify and discuss new challenges that such modifications bring for mega-event mobility planning. First, based on the academic literature of case studies of previous Olympic cities, a theoretical framework to systematize the mobility problem at the Olympic Games is proposed for further validation, identifying the dimensions of the related knowledge frames. Second, the mobility planning for the case study of the first ever Olympic region—the Milan–Cortina 2026 Winter Games—is described. Using this case study, the proposed framework is then extrapolated for cases of Olympic regions in order to identify any shifts in the paradigm of mobility planning when increasing the spatial scale of Olympic hosts. Conclusions indicate that, if properly addressed, unsustainability might be mitigated in Olympic regions, but mega-event planners will have to consider new issues affecting host communities and event stakeholders.
PID
— ARK: ark:/40019/oly.v4i4.32.g43
References
(1) Bovy P. Athens 2004 Olympic Games Transport. Str. Verkehr 2004; 7–8, 45–48.
(2) Bovy P. Solving outstanding mega-event transport challenges: The Olympic experience. Public Transp. Int. 2006; 6, 32–34.
(3) Kassens-Noor E. Sustaining the Momentum. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2010; 2187, 106–113.
(4) IOC. Olympic Agenda 2020—Olympic Games: The New Norm; IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2018.
(5) Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D. Regression to the Tail: Why the Olympics Blow Up. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020;53(2).
(6) Kassens-Noor E. Transport Legacy of the Olympic Games, 1992–2012. Journal of Urban Affairs. 2013 Oct;35(4):393–416.
(7) Essex S, Chalkley B. Mega‐sporting events in urban and regional policy: a history of the Winter Olympics. Planning Perspectives. 2004 Apr;19(2):201–4.
(8) Liao H, Pitts A. A brief historical review of Olympic urbanization. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 2006 Nov;23(7):1232–52.
(9) Gold JR, Gold MM. Olympic cities : city agendas, planning and the world’s games, 1896-2016. London ; New York: Routledge; 2011.
(10) Robbins D, Dickinson J, Calver S. Planning transport for special events: a conceptual framework and future agenda for research. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2007;9(5):303–14.
(11) Currie G, Delbosc A. Assessing Travel Demand Management for the Summer Olympic Games. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2011 Jan;2245(1):36–48.
(12) Bovy P. No Transport White Elephants. Siemens ITS Mag. Intell. Traffic Syst. 2010; 2, 16–18.
(13) Lopes dos Santos G, Gonçalves J. The Olympic Effect in Strategic planning: Insights from Candidate Cities. Planning Perspectives. 2021 Nov 22;37(4):1–25.
(14) Lopes dos Santos G, Gonçalves J, Condessa B, Nunes da Silva F, Delaplace M. Olympic Charter Evolution Shaped by Urban Strategies and Stakeholder’s Governance: From Pierre de Coubertin to the Olympic Agenda 2020. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 2021 Mar 24;38(5):545–68.
(15) IOC. Olympic Charter; IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2019.
(16) Banister D. Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011 Nov;19(6):1538–46.
(17) IOC. IOC Legacy Strategic Approach—Moving Forward; IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2017.
(18) Mao B. Analysis on Transport Policies of Post-Olympic Times of Beijing. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology. 2008 Dec;8(6):138–45.
(19) Zhou Y, Wu Y, Yang L, Fu L, He K, Wang S, et al. The impact of transportation control measures on emission reductions during the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment. 2010 Jan;44(3):285–93.
(20) Currie G, Shalaby A. Synthesis of Transport Planning Approaches for the World’s Largest Events. Transp. Rev. 2012; 32, 113–136.
(21) Bovy P. Beijing 2008 Olympic Games success: Massive public transport developments and major road traffic reduction. Public Transp. Int. 2009; 58, 52–55.
(22) Kassens-Noor E. Transportation planning and policy in the pursuit of mega-events: Boston’s 2024 Olympic bid. Transport Policy. 2019 Feb;74:239–45.
(23) Lauermann J. “The city” as developmental justification: claimsmaking on the urban through strategic planning. Urban Geography. 2015 Jul;37(1):77–95.
(24) IOC. The New Approach to Electing Olympic and Paralympic Hosts. Available online: https://olympics.com/ioc/future-host-election (accessed on 3 September 2021).
(25) IOC. Host City Contract—Operational Requirements; IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2018.
(26) Kassens-Noor E. Transportation Planning for Mega-Events: A Model of Urban Change. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.
(27) Preuss H. Event legacy framework and measurement. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2018 Jul 24;11(1):103–18.
(28) Ieromonachou P, Warren J, Potter S. The Olympic transport legacy. Town Ctry. Plan. 2010; 79, 331–336.
(29) Preuss, H. The Conceptualization and Measurement of Mega Sport Event Legacies. J. Sport Tour. 2007, 12, 207–228.
(30) Girginov V. Governance of the London 2012 Olympic Games legacy. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2011 Jun 27;47(5):543–58.
(31) Karlaftis MG, Kepaptsoglou K, Stathopoulos A, Starra A. Planning Public Transport Networks for the 2004 Summer Olympics with Decision Support Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2004 Jan;1887(1):71–82.
(32) Delaplace M. The Relationship between Olympic Games and Tourism: Why Such Heterogeneity? Towards a Place-Based Approach. In Hosting the Olympic Games: Uncertainty, Debates and Controversy, 1st ed, Delaplace, M., Schut, P.O., Eds, Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2020; Part II, Chapter 7; pp. 127–148.
(33) Bovy P, Potier F, Liaudat C. Les Grandes Manifestations: Plannification, Gestion des Mobilités et Impacts. Recherche DRAST Nº00 MT30/RATP, Programme National de Recherche et d’Innovation dans les Transports Terrestres; France. 2003. Available online: http://isidoredd.documentation.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/documents/CETTEXST005049/CETTEXST005049.pdf (accessed on 2 January 2022).
(34) Kassens-Noor E. Managing Transport at the Football World Cup. In Managing the Football World Cup, 1st ed, Frawley, S., Adair, D., Eds, Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2014; Chapter 9; pp. 149–174.
(35) Frantzeskakis JM, Frantzeskakis MJ. Athens 2004 Olympic Games: Transportation Planning, Simulation and Traffic Management. ITE J. 2006; 76, 26–32.
(36) Parkes SD, Jopson A, Marsden G. Understanding travel behaviour change during mega-events: Lessons from the London 2012 Games. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet]. 2016 Oct 1;92:104–19. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096585641630101X
(37) Bovy P. Public transport international. 2004 Mar 1;53(2).
(38) Hensher DA, Brewer AM. Going for gold at the Sydney Olympics: How did transport perform? Transport Reviews. 2002 Jan;22(4):381–99.
(39) Chappelet JL. From Chamonix to Salt Lake City: Evolution of the Olympic Village at the Winter Games. In Olympic Villages: A Hundred Years of Urban Planning and Shared Experiences, 1st ed, Moragas M, Llinés M, Kidd B, Eds, IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 1997; Chapter I; pp. 81–88.
(40) Sumner H. Delivering London 2012: Transport legacy. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport. 2012 Nov;165(4):267–75.
(41) Sumner H. Delivering London 2012: spectator transport. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering. 2011 May;164(5):55–61.
(42) IOC. Accreditation at the Olympic Games—Detailed Specifications—ACR Annex 1; IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2019.
(43) Banister D. The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm. Transport Policy [Internet]. 2008 Mar;15(2):73–80. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X07000820
(44) Holt R. Routledge handbook of sport and legacy : meeting the challenge of major sports events. London: Routledge; 2017.
(45) Lindau LA, Petzhold G, Tavares VB, Facchini D. Mega events and the transformation of Rio de Janeiro into a mass-transit city. Research in Transportation Economics. 2016 Nov;59:196–203.
(46) Scheu A, Preuss H. The Legacy of the Olympic Games from 1896–2016. A systematic review of academic publications. Work. Pap. Ser. Mainz. Pap. Sport Econ. Manag. 2017; 14. Available online: https://library.olympics.com/Default/doc/SYRACUSE/173342/the-legacy-of-the-olympic-games-from-1896-2016-a-systematic-review-of-academic-publications-working-?_lg=en-GB (accessed on 2 January 2022).
(47) Pereira RHM. Transport legacy of mega-events and the redistribution of accessibility to urban destinations. Cities. 2018 Nov;81:45–60.
(48) Odoni A, Stamatopoulos M, Kassens E, Metsovitis J. Preparing an Airport for the Olympic Games: Athens. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 2009 Mar;15(1):50–9.
(49) Milano-Cortina 2026. Milano Cortina 2026—Candidate City Olympic Winter Games; Milano-Cortina 2026: Milano, Italy, 2019.
(50) IOC. Factsheet: The Olympic Winter Games. Olympic Games. 2018. Available online: https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/Factsheets-Reference-Documents/Games/OWG/Factsheet-The-Olympic-Winter-Games.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2019).
(51) Schnitzer M, Haizinger L. Does the Olympic Agenda 2020 Have the Power to Create a New Olympic Heritage? An Analysis for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games Bid. Sustainability. 2019 Jan 16;11(2):442.
(52) IOC. Report—IOC Evaluation Commission: Olympic Winter Games 2026; IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2019.
(53) Müller M. The Mega-Event Syndrome: Why so Much Goes Wrong in Mega-Event Planning and What to Do about It. Journal of the American Planning Association [Internet]. 2015 Jan 2;81(1):6–17. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01944363.2015.1038292
(54) Kassens-Noor E, Wilson M, Müller S, Maharaj B, Huntoon L. Towards a mega-event legacy framework. Leisure Studies. 2015 Apr 29;34(6):665–71.
(55) Dos Santos LG, Condessa B, Da Silva NF, Delaplace M. Olympic Agenda 2020: Effects on the Games’ urban concept. In Proceedings of the Conference Grand Projects: Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century, Lisbon, Portugal, 17–19 February 2021; Tormenta Pinto, P., Brandão, A., Silva Lopes, S., Eds, DINÂMIA’CET: Lisbon, Portugal, 2021; pp. 85–98. Available online: https://www.grandprojects2021.com/programme (accessed on 29 December 2021).
(56) Xu Y, González MC. Collective benefits in traffic during mega events via the use of information technologies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface [Internet]. 2017 Apr 1;14(129). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414910/
(57) Antrop M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning [Internet]. 2004 Mar;67(1-4):9–26. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204603000264
(58) Munoz F. Lock living: Urban sprawl in Mediterranean cities. Cities. 2003 Dec;20(6):381–5.
(59) Bridge G, Watson S. The new Blackwell companion to the city. Malden, Ma: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
(60) Marzluff J, Springerlink (Online Service. Urban Ecology : An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature. New York, Ny: Springer Us; 2008.
(61) Lu J, Li B, Li H, Al-Barakani A. Expansion of city scale, traffic modes, traffic congestion, and air pollution. Cities. 2021 Jan;108:102974.
(62) Guo Y, Tang Z, Guo J. Could a Smart City Ameliorate Urban Traffic Congestion? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on a Smart City Pilot Program in China. Sustainability. 2020 Mar 15;12(6):2291.
(63) Hiller HH, Wanner RA. Public Opinion in Olympic Cities: From Bidding to Retrospection. Urban Affairs Review. 2016 Dec 22;54(5):962–93.
(64) Davoudi S. EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies. 2003 Dec;11(8):979–99.
______________________________________
Artigo adaptado e traduzido para o português pelos editores de OLYMPIKA MAGAZINE para republicação, conforme normas de submissão do periódico. Versão original em: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/910. LICENÇA ORIGINAL E DA VERSÃO: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
IMAGEM MERAMENTE ILUSTRATIVA. Porta-bandeiras na cerimônia de abertura dos Jogos Olímpicos de Milano-Cortina 2026. Por: Vice President JD Vance, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gustavo Lopes dos Santos, Rosário Macário, Marie Delaplace, Stefano Di Vita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
