Tênis de corrida de pista: Um relato de caso da transição dos Spikes clássicos para os “Super Spikes” na prova de pista

Luca Russo; Eleonora Montagnani; Daniel Buttari; Luca Paolo Ardigò; Ionel Melenco; Alin Larion; Gian Mario Migliaccio; Johnny Padulo

Autores/as

Luca Russo Department of Human Sciences, Università Telematica degli Studi IUL, Italy
Eleonora Montagnani Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, UK
Daniel Buttari Italian Air Force—Centro Sportivo Areonautica, Bracciano, Italy
Luca Paolo Ardigò Department of Teacher Education, NLA University College, Oslo, Norway
Ionel Melenco Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania
Alin Larion Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania
Gian Mario Migliaccio Sport Science Academy, Cagliari, Italy
Johnny Padulo Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy

Palabras clave:

marcha corriendo, rendimiento de carrera, biomecánica de carrera, presión del pie, zapatillas para correr, spike, atletismo en pista y campo

Resumen

La investigación sobre zapatillas para correr de alta tecnología está creciendo, pero hay pocos estudios disponibles sobre el uso de zapatillas para correr de alta tecnología (super Spikes), a pesar de su creciente popularidad entre los atletas. El objetivo de este estudio de caso fue investigar la cinemática, la cinética y las presiones plantares de un atleta olímpico que usa dos tipos diferentes de calzado, para proporcionar un método fácil y replicable para evaluar su influencia en la biomecánica de la carrera. El atleta evaluado realizó seis pruebas de carrera, a la misma velocidad, usando un par de zapatillas de deporte con puntas normales (NSS) y una zapatilla de deporte con puntas súper (SSS), en orden aleatorio. SSS aumentó el tiempo de contacto, el impacto vertical y la fuerza de giro (tamaño del efecto 3,70, 7,86 y 1,31, respectivamente), al tiempo que redujo el tipo de impacto del pie y la tasa de fuerza de reacción vertical en el suelo (tamaño del efecto 3,62 y 7,21, respectivamente). Además, se observó un cambio significativo en la carga medial y lateral, con el SSS induciendo una distribución de carga más simétrica entre los pies izquierdo y derecho en comparación con el NSS (carga medial izquierda del SSS 57,1 ± 2,1%, carga lateral izquierda 42,9 ± 1,4%, carga lateral derecha carga media 55,1 ± 2,6%, carga lateral derecha 44,9 ± 2,6%). Los resultados de este estudio de caso sugieren la importancia de utilizar la evaluación individual para evaluar las adaptaciones del calzado en atletas que corren, lo que puede inducir modificaciones biomecánicas y los entrenadores deben considerarlo para garantizar un rendimiento de carrera óptimo.

POID
— ark:/40019/oly.v2i.19.g29

Citas

(1) Picerno P, Padulo J. Acute kinematic adaptations to running on a centrifugal track: A pilot study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2018 Jan 1;232(3):275–81.

(2) Ae M. The next steps for expanding and developing sport biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics. 2020 May 13;1–22.

(3) Sun X, Lam WK, Zhang X, Wang J, Fu W. Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance. J. Sport. Sci. Med. 2020; 19, 20–37.

(4) Nielsen A, Heyde C, Simonsen MB, Larsen RG, Hansen RK, Kersting U, et al. Reliability of Running Economy Measurements: Influence of Shoe Familiarisation. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022 Aug 4;

(5) Xiang L, Gu Y, Rong M, Gao Z, Yang T, Wang A, et al. Shock Acceleration and Attenuation during Running with Minimalist and Maximalist Shoes: A Time- and Frequency-Domain Analysis of Tibial Acceleration. Bioengineering. 2022 Jul 16;9(7):322.

(6) Jaén-Carrillo D, Roche-Seruendo LE, Molina-Molina A, Cardiel-Sánchez S, Cartón-Llorente A, García-Pinillos F. Influence of the Shod Condition on Running Power Output: An Analysis in Recreationally Active Endurance Runners. Sensors. 2022 Jun 26;22(13):4828.

(7) Hébert-Losier K, Pamment M. Advancements in running shoe technology and their effects on running economy and performance – a current concepts overview. Sports Biomechanics. 2022 Aug 22;22(3):1–16.

(8) Ortega JA, Healey LA, Swinnen W, Hoogkamer W. Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review. Sports Medicine. 2021 Apr 8;51(5):873–94.

(9) Agresta C, Giacomazzi C, Harrast M, Zendler J. Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2022 Mar 9;4.

(10) Joubert DP, Jones GP. A comparison of running economy across seven highly cushioned racing shoes with carbon-fibre plates. Footwear Science. 2022 Feb 21;14(2):1–13.

(11) Healey L, Bertschy M, Kipp S, Hoogkamer W. Can We Quantify the Benefits of “Super Spikes” in Track Running?. Sports Medicine. 2022 Feb 23; 52, 1211–1218.

(12) Ardigò LP, Buglione A, Russo L, Cular D, Esposito F, Doria C, et al. Marathon shoes vs. track spikes: a crossover pilot study on metabolic demand at different speeds in experienced runners. Research in Sports Medicine. 2021 May 14;1–8.

(13) Koldenhoven RM, Hertel J. Validation of a Wearable Sensor for Measuring Running Biomechanics. Digital Biomarkers [Internet]. 2018;2(2):74–8. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/491645

(14) DeJong AF, Hertel J. Validation of Foot-Strike Assessment Using Wearable Sensors During Running. Journal of Athletic Training. 2020 Oct 16;55(12):1307–10.

(15) Kozinc Ž, Smajla D, Šarabon N. The reliability of wearable commercial sensors for outdoor assessment of running biomechanics: the effect of surface and running speed. Sports Biomechanics. 2022 Jan 12;1–14.

(16) Chaouachi A, Padulo J, Kasmi S, Othmen AB, Chatra M, Behm DG. Unilateral static and dynamic hamstrings stretching increases contralateral hip flexion range of motion. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2015 May 27;37(1):23–9.

(17) Davis IS, Rice HM, Wearing SC. Why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries. Journal of Sport and Health Science [Internet]. 2017 Jun;6(2):154–61. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254617300492

(18) Jordan C, Payton CJ, Bartlett RM. Perceived comfort and pressure distribution in casual footwear. Clinical Biomechanics. 1997 Apr;12(3):S5.

(19) Witana CP, Goonetilleke RS, Au EYL, Xiong S, Lu X. Footbed shapes for enhanced footwear comfort. Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):617–28.

(20) Péter A, Hegyi A, Stenroth L, Finni T, Cronin NJ. EMG and force production of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in isometric plantarflexion and the push-off phase of walking. Journal of Biomechanics. 2015 Sep;48(12):3413–9.

(21) Montiel V, Valentí A, Villas C, Valverde C, Alfonso M. Hallux anatomy: much ado about shoes—an attempt to prove that constrictive V-shaped toe-box shoes deform the hallux. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2021 Feb 16; 1–8.

________________________________

Article adapted and translated into Portuguese by the editors of OLYMPIKA MAGAZINE for republication, in accordance with the journal's submission rules. Original version at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/20/10195.